Express Computer
Home  »  101 Dalmatians -1996-  »  101 Dalmatians -1996-

worldwide, becoming the sixth highest-grossing film of 1996. Accolades: Glenn Close received a Golden Globe nomination

The production famously used animatronics and puppets for specific dangerous stunts (like the puppies sliding down a chute), but the emotional connection audiences felt for the dogs came from the real wriggling, licking, and tail-wagging on screen. The bond between Pongo, Perdita, and their human owners feels authentic because the dogs were genuinely responding to the actors.

One of the nostalgic joys of rewatching the film is the time capsule of mid-90s London. From Roger’s clunky video game design gear (massive monitors and floppy disks) to the panoramic shots of the then-newly renovated Lion King theater in the West End, the movie drips with 1990s aesthetic.

In the end, the 1996 101 Dalmatians is like Cruella’s ideal coat: flashy, expensive, and made of parts that don’t quite fit together. The dogs are cute, the production design is rich, and Glenn Close is an all-timer. But the heart of the original—the silent, desperate journey of two parents across a winter landscape—is replaced with mugging, noise, and too many explosions. It’s a fun, furry, forgettable romp. And sometimes, that’s enough.

For a 1996 family film, the canine effects are a mixed bag. Real dogs (230 of them, trained by animal coordinator Gary Gero) are used extensively. The sequences of the adult Dalmatians nudging open gates, sliding down hay chutes, and herding puppies are charmingly old-school. However, when the film resorts to animatronics or early CGI for the puppies (especially during the climactic car chase through Cruella’s manor), the illusion breaks. The puppies’ mouths move like ventriloquist dummies, and their digital escape across a frozen river feels dated.