For example, when discussing Kant’s rejection of the ontological proof for God, Fraile does not mock Kant. He shows the logical structure of Kant’s argument, then gently notes the metaphysical assumptions Kant himself could not prove. This dialectical tension makes Fraile’s text a .
Because this is a classic academic work, users looking for a digital version often encounter it through university repositories and digital archives.
: Including the voluntarism of Schopenhauer , the realism of Herbart , and the beginnings of Krausism .